Reflections on the Journey of an Instructional Coach

Instructional coaching is a unique, challenging, and rewarding role, rooted in collaboration and innovation. Over my 20 years in education, transitioning from teaching to instructional coaching, and now into instructional design and consulting, I’ve observed how various fields approach professional development. Unlike many industries where employees have autonomy, education often leaves teachers feeling monitored, impacting their morale and satisfaction. This insight has shaped my approach to coaching, underscoring the importance of respecting teachers’ professional autonomy.

The Role of an Instructional Coach

At its best, instructional coaching builds on strong, trusting relationships with teachers. Coaches support teachers in achieving their goals, but navigating each teacher’s unique needs, styles, and occasional resistance to change requires adaptability and a commitment to building trust. Without trust, coaching remains superficial, with minimal impact on teaching practices or student outcomes.

Treating Teachers as Professionals

Teachers deserve to drive their own professional growth. Instructional coaches should offer teachers choice and autonomy in their development. Walkthroughs, for example, should be teacher-driven, allowing educators to choose observation areas and partners. Coaches act as collaborators, not enforcers, supporting teachers’ self-directed learning and reducing unnecessary oversight.

Challenges in Instructional Coaching

Coaching faces hurdles like time constraints, role ambiguity, and teacher resistance. Teachers are often stretched thin, and finding time for coaching can be difficult. Clear expectations are essential—teachers need to understand that coaches are there to facilitate growth, not to provide quick fixes. Scheduling coaching during protected times, like early release days, or offering short, actionable advice can make sessions more accessible. Recording sessions for later review gives teachers flexibility to engage with coaching at their own pace.

The Negative Impact of Micromanagement

Micromanagement is known to increase stress, reduce motivation, and lower job satisfaction. In education, micromanagement can hinder teacher engagement and retention. According to research from the *International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science*, micromanaged employees experience high stress, diminished autonomy, and low morale—all factors that erode productivity and engagement. Reducing micromanagement in coaching and empowering teachers can significantly improve both teacher satisfaction and student outcomes.

Fostering Flexibility and Collaboration

Effective coaching adapts to each teacher’s needs. Collaborative coaching sessions allow teachers and coaches to define goals together, develop strategies, and foster continuous improvement. This partnership respects teachers’ professional expertise and promotes a shared culture of growth, creating a foundation for lasting change.

Clarifying the Coach’s Role

Clear role definitions are essential in instructional coaching. When teachers and coaches understand their roles and responsibilities, it sets the stage for effective, productive collaboration. Teachers may initially view coaches as solution-providers, expecting them to deliver quick fixes or turnkey strategies. However, the true strength of instructional coaching lies in its emphasis on reflection, collaboration, and gradual improvement rather than prescriptive answers.

A lack of clarity in the coach’s role can lead to confusion and frustration. Teachers might feel that the support they receive doesn’t match their expectations, causing disengagement or resistance. Without clear role boundaries, coaches may also find themselves straying from a collaborative approach, leading to a one-sided dynamic where teachers feel less ownership over their own growth. Teachers may come to rely on coaches for direction rather than using coaching sessions as opportunities to explore ideas, refine their practices, and actively contribute to their professional development.

Without role clarity, several issues can arise:

1. Reduced Teacher Autonomy

When teachers expect coaches to provide ready-made solutions, they may feel less empowered to explore and test their own ideas. This can reduce their autonomy and investment in the coaching process. They may adopt new practices temporarily but revert to familiar methods if they don’t feel a sense of ownership or connection to the changes they’re implementing.

2. Frustration and Misalignment

Misaligned expectations can breed frustration for both teachers and coaches. Teachers might feel that the coaching isn’t meeting their needs if they expect immediate answers, while coaches may feel ineffective if teachers resist a reflective, gradual approach. This tension can undermine the coaching relationship, making it difficult to build the trust and openness necessary for impactful coaching.

3. Lack of Sustainable Change

When coaches provide solutions without facilitating teacher reflection, changes are often superficial and short-lived. Teachers may adopt strategies in the short term but abandon them once the coach is no longer present. Effective coaching should focus on building teachers’ capacity for self-reflection and continuous improvement, enabling them to adapt and evolve their practices long after the coaching cycle ends.

4. Role Creep

Without clear role boundaries, coaches risk being pulled into tasks outside their scope, such as administrative duties or direct problem-solving for immediate classroom issues. This “role creep” can dilute the effectiveness of coaching, taking time away from meaningful discussions that drive lasting instructional improvement. Additionally, coaches who feel pressured to take on administrative roles may find it harder to build trust and partnership with teachers, as they may be seen as evaluators rather than collaborators.

5. Erosion of Trust

Misunderstandings about the coach’s role can erode trust. If teachers expect quick solutions and receive reflective support instead, they may view coaching as unhelpful or misaligned with their needs. Conversely, if coaches push too hard without understanding teachers’ perspectives, teachers may feel unsupported or micromanaged. Clear role definitions help avoid these issues by setting realistic expectations that respect the collaborative, growth-oriented nature of coaching.

6. Less Productive Sessions

Productive coaching sessions rely on mutual engagement and clear objectives. If roles are ambiguous, sessions may become unfocused, with teachers waiting for answers while coaches aim to facilitate reflection. By establishing mutually agreed-upon goals and a shared understanding of the coaching process, sessions become more purposeful, with both parties contributing actively toward achieving growth.

To prevent these pitfalls, it’s essential to clarify roles from the outset. Setting mutually agreed-upon goals and establishing a shared understanding of the coach’s role as a facilitator, rather than a director, helps create a partnership grounded in respect and collaboration. When teachers see coaches as collaborators, rather than evaluators or supervisors, they are more likely to engage fully, explore new ideas, and take ownership of their growth. This clarity leads to more productive sessions, stronger outcomes, and a professional learning experience that fosters lasting improvement.

Overcoming Teacher Resistance

Resistance to change is common. Teachers often rely on trusted instructional practices and may hesitate to adopt new ones without clear evidence of their effectiveness. Instructional coaches play a key role in easing this transition by helping teachers see practical benefits in ways that respect their experience and expertise. Showing evidence of new strategies that have succeeded in similar classrooms can help teachers envision these methods in their own teaching, reducing apprehension and proving that change doesn’t have to be a leap into the unknown.

Building trust is also essential. Coaches cultivate trust by being transparent, approachable, and validating teachers’ concerns. Actively listening to feedback helps coaches tailor their recommendations to each teacher’s needs, showing that their perspectives are valued and that the coach’s role is to support, not impose. Coaches can strengthen this trust by following up on past conversations, checking on new strategies, and offering adjustments as needed.

Gradual change is often more effective than pushing for immediate transformation. Rather than introducing multiple practices at once, coaches can suggest small, manageable adjustments that teachers can test and refine over time. For instance, a coach introducing data-driven instruction might begin with a simple data analysis technique, allowing teachers to build confidence with each small success. This approach reduces feelings of overwhelm, builds confidence, and paves the way for more substantial shifts over time.

By combining evidence, trust-building, and gradual implementation, instructional coaches help teachers overcome resistance and adopt new methods. This approach respects teachers’ professionalism and supports them in making meaningful, student-centered improvements.

Building a Supportive Coaching Environment

Instructional coaching should empower teachers to take ownership of their professional development. Coaches act as guides, helping teachers reflect on their strengths, identify areas for growth, and apply new strategies. This approach fosters a culture of self-reflection and continuous improvement, where teachers feel supported in making student-centered changes.

Instructional coaching is a dynamic field that requires a balance of support, respect for teachers’ autonomy, and a commitment to growth. A flexible, collaborative approach allows instructional coaches to have a lasting impact on teacher development and student learning. As I continue in instructional design and consulting, these principles remain central to my work. Reflecting on my coaching experience, it’s clear that trust, autonomy, and professional respect are essential for impactful coaching that supports educators in their growth.

Previous
Previous

Decision Making with the Short Data Cycle

Next
Next

Starting a New Role as an Instructional Coach: Your First 30 Days